Blood on the Tracks
Why are there so few Black students in our science classes?
Amy Lindahl
In the article, Blood on the Tracks: Why are there so few Black students in our science classes? by Amy Lindahl, enrollment disparities amongst different races within science classrooms is explored. The article is written from the perspective of a science teacher from Portland, Oregon. When looking at the students within her different level classes she noticed great differences in the student populations. Pointedly she says in, "chemistry, which was a prerequisite for upper-level science classes, including Advanced Placement (AP) classes, there was 78 percent white and only 7 percent African American students. (It was 6 percent Latina/o and 3 percent Asian.)" (Lindahl). This data shows that there is a lower enrollment of Black or African American students in a class that puts students on an educational pathway towards accelerated classes.
This reminds me of the article Literature with an Attitude by Finn where he also shows data that supports the idea that different demographics of students receive different educations within our nation. In his article Finn says, "I'd like to hope that a child's expectations are not determined on the day he or she enters kindergarten." (Finn, page 25) This statement is both striking and saddening as the data shows this to be true. In Lindahl's article, she speaks to this difference in classroom enrollment in the sciences. From her own experience she shares, "Although my AP Biology classes were 69 percent white students and 9 percent Black students, my Ecology class was 54 percent white students and 38 percent Black students." (Lindahl) Similar to Finns sharings, Amy Lindahl shows that there is a major difference in the percentage of Black students enrolled in advanced science classes compared to 'standard level' courses.
In the conclusion of Lindahl's article she explains what needs to be done to correct the disparity of white students to students of color in advanced science classes. She says, "Changes in course offerings and elimination of low-track offerings can decrease racial segregation. But ultimately, achieving equity demands extensive experimentation with pedagogical strategies and curriculum." (Lindahl) As educators we must take steps towards creating an EQUITABLE, not equal, education for all of our students. The education of our young people in this country is of the utmost importance in changing our society in a more favorable way. Education is the most powerful tool in ending discrimination.
Hi Kate! The article that you chose this week is so interesting. I loved reading your conclusion.. Equitable access to education for our young people is necessary in making our society better in every way. There is an amazing Chemistry professor at Holy Cross who I see on TikTok/Instagram named Andre Isaacs... He speaks on this issue frequently on social media, and he serves as a great inspiration for people of color in STEM as well as LGBTQ+ youth. Great work!
ReplyDeleteHi Katie!
ReplyDeleteThis article sounds really interesting! As I was reading this I was also thinking about that quote from Finn, "...hope that a child's expectations are not determined on the day she or he enters kindergarten." One has to wonder if the enrollment of marginalized students has something to do with cultural expectations. Science is a huge part of language development in the lower grades and this article reaffirms my "why" when I take something off the schedule to fit in science. Well done!
I think your conclusion spoke volumes. The last few sentences really stood out to me and I think you put it perfectly in words, we need to make education equitable not equal as well as the educational opportunities for all students no matter race, gender, ability, etc.
ReplyDelete